Thursday, February 27, 2014
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Documenting Sodom: Iconic 9-11 photo deemed "ABUSIVE" by Facebook...
Gotta see this... Not surprise. But gotta see it...
Read It: Here...
Facebook has repeatedly attacked Barracuda Brigade during our 4 plus years of existence over posts of documented news stories. Each time we “appealed” the action to Facebook. We pointed out to Facebook that a documented and sourced news story cannot be a violation of any policy.
On 9/5/13 America under President Obama’s orders, was on the brink of launching some type of military action in Syria against the Assad government. Without replaying the entire sequence of events, America in every credible and respected poll overwhelmingly was against doing this. Our nation’s primary reason for rejecting Obama’s decision to attack Syria was in most part based on the fact that we would be using America’s military to advance the military and ideological goals and standing of America’s sworn enemy Al-Qaeda, as stated in Federal law. There was no question then or now that the “Syrian Rebels” are nothing but Al-Qaeda direct and their affiliated Islamic jihadist groups dressed up in a politically correct label.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada was directed by President Obama to call a “vote of authorization” in the Senate. To our utter disbelief and frankly disgust, the vote to advance Al-Qaeda’s goals using America’s military was scheduled for 9/11/13. The same date 12 years later of the Al-Qaeda attacks of 9/11/01 on America, which killed 2800 plus of our citizens. Also just 1 year from Al-Qaeda’s attack of 9/11/12 on our Ambassador and others in Benghazi. The same date which for each year after 9/11/01 memorial services are held in New York, Washington DC, Shanksville and all across America and the world for that matter. The vision of the grieving families as the names of their lost loved ones being called, while the Senate concurrently was voting to approve military operations on Al-Qaeda’s behalf was utterly sickening to all Americans. How any sitting POTUS could give such a directive to his Senate Majority Leader, it’s beyond any and all comprehension.
Barracuda Brigade posted this story and image on 9/5/13, for the record that was over 4 plus months ago. As history will record, the vote never happened. America wouldn't tolerate it. To our utter disbelief on 1/15/14 Facebook took adverse action against the page and it’s staff for this post. They cited a historically documented and sourced photo from 9/11/01 as “Inappropriate and Offensive.” The story itself was not the “trigger” for their action, the horrifically iconic image of that dreadful Tuesday is what they had and still have an issue with.
Joe Newby of examiner.com filed a direct “appeal” to Facebook on 1/15/14. Today is 1/25/14 and still there is no response from Facebook. The adverse actions taken against Barracuda Brigade and her staff, are still in place. Facebook’s actions in this case are way beyond unacceptable, they're egregious and a total insult directly against the families who lost loved ones on 9/11/01; as well as all of America and the freedom loving world.
To Facebook Barracuda Brigade says this directly without any hesitation, what is wrong with you? You're a “Fortune 500” company trading openly on the stock market. Do your investors know that you view sourced and documented images from 9/11/01 as “Offensive and Inappropriate?” Is that the reason your policies do not state explicitly that any and all images of 9/11/01 are unacceptable and the trigger for adverse action?
How exactly do you plan on explaining this to the loved ones and friends of those lost on 9/11/01 who use Facebook?
If documented and sourced images from 9/11/01 are triggers for adverse action, then are images sourced and documented from D-Day, Pearl Harbor, Gettysburg or Bunker Hill also adverse action inducing and prohibited? How about Desert Storm, Iraqi Freedom or Libya?
http://barracudabrigade.blogspot.com/2014/01/wth-iconic-9-11-photo-deemed-abusive-by.html?utm_content=buffer23078&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Read It: Here...
Facebook has repeatedly attacked Barracuda Brigade during our 4 plus years of existence over posts of documented news stories. Each time we “appealed” the action to Facebook. We pointed out to Facebook that a documented and sourced news story cannot be a violation of any policy.
On 9/5/13 America under President Obama’s orders, was on the brink of launching some type of military action in Syria against the Assad government. Without replaying the entire sequence of events, America in every credible and respected poll overwhelmingly was against doing this. Our nation’s primary reason for rejecting Obama’s decision to attack Syria was in most part based on the fact that we would be using America’s military to advance the military and ideological goals and standing of America’s sworn enemy Al-Qaeda, as stated in Federal law. There was no question then or now that the “Syrian Rebels” are nothing but Al-Qaeda direct and their affiliated Islamic jihadist groups dressed up in a politically correct label.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada was directed by President Obama to call a “vote of authorization” in the Senate. To our utter disbelief and frankly disgust, the vote to advance Al-Qaeda’s goals using America’s military was scheduled for 9/11/13. The same date 12 years later of the Al-Qaeda attacks of 9/11/01 on America, which killed 2800 plus of our citizens. Also just 1 year from Al-Qaeda’s attack of 9/11/12 on our Ambassador and others in Benghazi. The same date which for each year after 9/11/01 memorial services are held in New York, Washington DC, Shanksville and all across America and the world for that matter. The vision of the grieving families as the names of their lost loved ones being called, while the Senate concurrently was voting to approve military operations on Al-Qaeda’s behalf was utterly sickening to all Americans. How any sitting POTUS could give such a directive to his Senate Majority Leader, it’s beyond any and all comprehension.
Barracuda Brigade posted this story and image on 9/5/13, for the record that was over 4 plus months ago. As history will record, the vote never happened. America wouldn't tolerate it. To our utter disbelief on 1/15/14 Facebook took adverse action against the page and it’s staff for this post. They cited a historically documented and sourced photo from 9/11/01 as “Inappropriate and Offensive.” The story itself was not the “trigger” for their action, the horrifically iconic image of that dreadful Tuesday is what they had and still have an issue with.
Joe Newby of examiner.com filed a direct “appeal” to Facebook on 1/15/14. Today is 1/25/14 and still there is no response from Facebook. The adverse actions taken against Barracuda Brigade and her staff, are still in place. Facebook’s actions in this case are way beyond unacceptable, they're egregious and a total insult directly against the families who lost loved ones on 9/11/01; as well as all of America and the freedom loving world.
To Facebook Barracuda Brigade says this directly without any hesitation, what is wrong with you? You're a “Fortune 500” company trading openly on the stock market. Do your investors know that you view sourced and documented images from 9/11/01 as “Offensive and Inappropriate?” Is that the reason your policies do not state explicitly that any and all images of 9/11/01 are unacceptable and the trigger for adverse action?
How exactly do you plan on explaining this to the loved ones and friends of those lost on 9/11/01 who use Facebook?
If documented and sourced images from 9/11/01 are triggers for adverse action, then are images sourced and documented from D-Day, Pearl Harbor, Gettysburg or Bunker Hill also adverse action inducing and prohibited? How about Desert Storm, Iraqi Freedom or Libya?
http://barracudabrigade.blogspot.com/2014/01/wth-iconic-9-11-photo-deemed-abusive-by.html?utm_content=buffer23078&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Take Courage...
If Venezuela and Ukraine and other parts of the world are of any indication, America is NOT beaten yet...
Monday, February 24, 2014
Sunday, February 23, 2014
Friday, February 21, 2014
Fast Food Worker Who Wants $15 an Hour, Meet Your Replacements...
Fast Food Workers Who Want 15 An Hour, Meet Your Replacements
64,000 of these “electronic cashiers” are now in place at McDonald’s restaurants around Europe and they’ll be coming to the U.S. probably sooner than you think.
http://weaselzippers.us/175393-fast-food-workers-who-want-15-an-hour-meet-your-replacements/
BLACK GENOCIDE: Abortion and Black Communities...
|
Thursday, February 20, 2014
James Wood's Hollywood...
A good Friend send me this the other day...
A good friend sent this pic from the world premiere of Once Upon a Time in America, Cannes, 1984 pic.twitter.com/FMhCoAF0PN
A good friend sent this pic from the world premiere of Once Upon a Time in America, Cannes, 1984 pic.twitter.com/FMhCoAF0PN
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
If you really want to help the poor you will stand up for Capitalism...
Unlike the Christians, Jews, Farmers, Ranchers, Merchants... The Godless Marxists, leftist and islamists have learned it is much easier to Loot, Plunder, Enslave their fellow man than to try to Serve them...
Here we are again as Spirited HUmans... Good Against Evil....
A Proud Democrat/Progressive...
Is he a proud Democrat? You better believe it...
Anyone that can defraud, lie and cheat to America and its taxpayers that much, with awesome thievery and corrupt and criminal elements as government is a card carrying anti-American Marxists Democrat and proud of it... It Also make all other Godless, anti-Capitalist, anti-Christians, anti-American fellow marxists happy and proud....
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BguSF5oCIAAQBLN.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BguSF5oCIAAQBLN.jpg
Monday, February 17, 2014
Documenting Sodom: Lying, coercing, defrauding, and scheming - for marriage equality! The latest ‘gay bashing’ hoax...
Lying, coercing, defrauding, and scheming - for marriage equality! The latest ‘gay bashing’ hoax...
Feb. 17, 2014 (MattWalsh) - We all know the score.
This is how the game is played.
They lie, and cooperate with lies, and become willing participants in things that are very likely to be lies, and they do it all for the greater good.
Did you hear about the infamous gay bashing birthday party RSVP from earlier this week? The story set social media on fire. Two gay dads threw a tie dye party for their 7-year-old daughter, Sophia, and invited all of the neighborhood children over to celebrate. But some anti-gay mother (probably a Christian, as countless people on Facebook and Twitter observed) declined the invitation, and she did so in the rudest way possible. Rather than simply offering a polite ‘sorry, we can’t make it,’ she jotted down a vicious anti-gay rant, and sent it to Sophia’s dads.
The note said: “Tommy will NOT attend. I do not believe in what you do and will not subject my innocent son to your “lifestyle.” I’m sorry Sophia has to grow up this way.”
When I first saw this story, my initial thought was: who in God’s name throws tie dye parties anymore?
Then my second thought was: how long before we find out that this entire story is a hoax? I told my wife it would be two weeks. I was wrong. It took one week. A couple of days ago, the inevitable inevitably happened. We discovered that the Tale of the Anti Gay RSVP was, in fact, a complete fabrication, cooked up by a morning radio show.
Don’t worry, they say they only wanted to “start a conversation.”
Mission accomplished. Conversation started.
Well, it wasn’t so much a ‘conversation’ as it was an excuse for a bunch of nincompoops to spew tired old anti-Christian and anti-conservative clichés – but I guess that’s what passes for dialogue these days.
You know, I’m beginning to suspect that the folks who spread these fraudulent parables of “anti-gay bias” might be doing it on purpose.
I’m starting to suspect that these people aren’t as gullible as they pretend to be.
I might be onto something.
Look at Jezebel’s post on the bigoted birthday snub: Gay Dads Receive Mean, Homophobic RSVP to Their Kid’s Birthday Party. The writer rants about this “mean” woman, and reports the perceived ”facts” of the case. Then, in the second to last paragraph, she says this: “Of course, this note could be a fake just to get us all frothing and get this radio station’s name in the news. It kind of seems fake.”
She thinks it “seems fake” YET SHE SPREAD THE STORY ANYWAY.
Hey, Lindy West, if you think the story is fake, howza ’bout tossing an “allegedly” into that title? Or maybe you should, I dunno, just not intentionally reiterate an anecdote you suspect to be false.
It’s called “integrity.” Look into it sometime.
But the false narrative is the primary weapon in the arsenal of the progressive. Maybe it’s their only weapon. In no area is this more pronounced or prevalent than in the realm of “gay rights.” The gay rights movement is built on mischaracterizations, fabrications, and outright lies. They don’t always come up with the lie — this one originated as nothing more than a radio station’s cheap publicity stunt — but they will use it for their benefit.
As the Jezebel writer said, in a stunning admission: “But, fake or not, “Beth‘s homophobic mindset is real and common and gross. So froth away.”
Translation: “I know this didn’t happen, but I’m sure things like it HAVE happened, so go ahead and get all riled up about a fairy tale. I’m not interested in reality, only emotion. Use this to feed your anger at the people who disagree with our position on this topic.”
This incident happens only a couple of months after a lesbian waitress in New Jersey took to the internet to complain about an anti-gay note left on a receipt. The note said: “I’m sorry but I cannot tip because I do not agree with your lifestyle.” In the surprise twist ending that was neither surprising nor twisty, it eventually came out that the whole thing was a hoax. The waitress made it up.
Of course she made it up.
“I can’t tip because I don’t agree with your lifestyle”? Really? Why would the customer even know her “lifestyle” in the first place? As a lesbian, at what point in taking someone’s food order and refilling their Cokes do you find an opportunity to inform them of your sexual affinity for other women?
But the people who reposted this garbage on their Facebook and Twitter feeds didn’t bother asking that question. And the media outlets that reported it didn’t bother fact checking any aspect of the story until it began to unravel on its own.
That’s because the truth is irrelevant here.
It’s all about the narrative. That’s it.
In fact, instances of fake gay bashing and fabricated homophobic ”hate crimes” are so common that I’d need to drag this on for 20 pages just to come close to listing all of the more recent cases. Here’s a good one. A lesbian couple spray painted the phrase “kill the gay” on their own garage. Because “kill the gay” is something that traditional marriage advocates frequently say.
And another.
And another.
And another.
And another.
And another.
And another.
And another.
And another.
I’m sure, as we speak, there’s yet another wannabe victim on some liberal arts campus somewhere busily planning a biased assault on themselves. And I’m just as sure that gay rights advocates will seize on their unlikely fable and use it to turn their opposition into straw men who refuse to tip lesbians.
But there’s more than one way to construct a narrative. Bald faced lying is simply one strategy.
Mythologizing can be even more effective.
Right in front of our eyes, out in the open, they make men into myths.
They made a marginal, obscure, unremarkable, aging NBA benchwarmer into a “historic” sports legend. Jason Collins was morphed into Jackie Robinson — which is about as absurd as attempting to turn Billy Ripken into Babe Ruth.
As you recall, Jason Collins — in a ploy to buy himself a few more years of being drastically overpaid by the NBA — came out of the closet last year. The media erupted in applause, and everyone from Hollywood celebrities to the President of the United States of America chimed in to mark the occasion.
The stage was set for the progressive narrative.
They had their hero, now they needed to make him into a victim. Right on cue, as the new season rolled around and, shockingly, no team jumped at the opportunity to hire a bench riding media-spectacle, the gentle insinuations of “bias” began to surface. The New York Times published an article, Jason Collins, Openly Gay and Still Unsigned, Waits and Wonders. The writer pontificates: “The question Collins has to ponder is why he has not been signed as a free agent.”
Uh, could it be that he’s 35 and averages under four points a game? Could it be that teams would rather pay a younger guy less money for more production than an older guy more money for less production? Maybe. Or maybe, as the article suggests, something “sinister” is afoot. Collins, for his part, thinks that’s “possible,” but he wouldn’t want to speculate (awfully charitable of you, Jason).
And now the NFL has become another staging ground for the gay victimhood mythology. It was inevitable. As soon as Michael Sam announced his sexual habits publicly, we knew what would come next. He’ll be a victim, even if he’s not. NFL teams are in a lose-lose predicament. They can draft him higher than he deserves to be drafted, and find themselves under the close scrutiny of the media and gay rights organizations who are waiting eagerly for any example of gay discrimination in the locker room or on the field. Or NFL clubs can refuse to distract their entire team for the sake of winning points with progressives by drafting an undersized, middle round defensive prospect, and be accused of “homophobia” and “bigotry” because of it.
It doesn’t matter what happens next. Michael Sam will be a victim. Michael Sam will be what the narrative needs him to be. He is now another character in a fictitious drama, written and produced by agenda-driven liars and schemers.
It used to take centuries to make a man into a legend. Now it happens overnight.
Click "like" if you support TRADITIONAL marriage.
Of course, no blog post about fake gay rights narratives would be complete without mentioning the Mother of All Narratives. The narrative which quickly became gospel; which became engrained in the public conscience; which led to volumes and volumes of legislation; which, quite literally, changed the course of modern history.
Matthew Shepard.
Matthew Shepard, the young gay man, brutally slaughtered 15 years ago. Murdered and tortured for being gay.
At least, that’s the narrative.
The reality, though still violent and tragic, is likely quite different from the fable we’ve been sold. It was ten years ago that ABC ran a story debunking many of the lies surrounding the Shepard case. Their investigation found that the young man was killed by two druggies who weren’t in the throes of homophobic hysteria, but rather meth-induced rage. He was killed because of drugs, not sexuality.
A sad story, for sure, but not one that’s useful to the narrative.
So the reporters behind the ABC piece were attacked and vilified for their bigoted act of honest journalism, and the whole ordeal was pushed under the proverbial rug.
Until a few months ago, when an openly gay journalist named Stephen Jimenez published a book detailing the findings of his decade-long investigation into the Shepard murder. He claims that Shepard’s killer was also Shepard’s former gay lover, and that both men were drug addicts. The killing occurred after a drug-related dispute.
Still sad. Still terrible. But not helpful to the narrative.
Unlike the fictitious saga that swept through the nation before the police had even arrested the suspects, the revelations by Jimenez and ABC come after a thoughtful analysis of the facts. Jimenez’s book cites over 100 named sources, and references information that was actually included in the initial police reports — like the fact that Shepard’s killer was a known bisexual.
The Shepard story, as it’s been told, is a lie.
But it’s a convenient lie. A useful lie. A Lie for the Greater Good.
So it’s a lie they’ll keep telling. Like all of the other lies they tell.
It’s not that they hate the truth — it’s just that they can’t find a place for it in the story.
Sunday, February 16, 2014
Saturday, February 15, 2014
Friday, February 14, 2014
Thursday, February 13, 2014
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Mother's Love In Sodom...
Hey did we expect anything else from same folks who brought you gay marriage. And the same folks who are pushing hard doing away with the age-of-consent... I'm sure in 20 years Ms. Seymour can marry both her sons...
As always, Thanks yahoo.com for unwittingly documenting the last days of Sodom...
http://shine.yahoo.com/healthy-living/stephanie-seymour-s-mother-son-photos--what-s-wrong-with-this-picture-195000708.html
Sooo ... this is awkward. In a provocative new photo shoot forHarper’s Bazaar, supermodel Stephanie Seymour dons lingerie and strikes come-and-get-it poses while draping herself around two much-younger men. Oh, and those guys just happen to be her sons, Peter Brant II, 20, and Harry Brant, 17.
One photo (seen left) in the 11-page spread depicts Seymour wearing a black, backless, cleavage-baring minidress. She faces one son, whose arm is wrapped around her waist, while the other son’s hand rests near her rear end. Seymour’s own hand covers her crotch. In another photo, she rocks a corset, briefs, and lace-up boots, while her sons pull at her boot strings. And in a third, Seymour sports a sheer dress, while her sons kneel on either side of her body — one hugs her thigh, the other rests his head close to her hip. The rest of the photos are two degrees tamer: The family playfully poses while applying makeup, wearing funky headdresses, and brushing their hair.
As always, Thanks yahoo.com for unwittingly documenting the last days of Sodom...
http://shine.yahoo.com/healthy-living/stephanie-seymour-s-mother-son-photos--what-s-wrong-with-this-picture-195000708.html
Sooo ... this is awkward. In a provocative new photo shoot forHarper’s Bazaar, supermodel Stephanie Seymour dons lingerie and strikes come-and-get-it poses while draping herself around two much-younger men. Oh, and those guys just happen to be her sons, Peter Brant II, 20, and Harry Brant, 17.
One photo (seen left) in the 11-page spread depicts Seymour wearing a black, backless, cleavage-baring minidress. She faces one son, whose arm is wrapped around her waist, while the other son’s hand rests near her rear end. Seymour’s own hand covers her crotch. In another photo, she rocks a corset, briefs, and lace-up boots, while her sons pull at her boot strings. And in a third, Seymour sports a sheer dress, while her sons kneel on either side of her body — one hugs her thigh, the other rests his head close to her hip. The rest of the photos are two degrees tamer: The family playfully poses while applying makeup, wearing funky headdresses, and brushing their hair.
Here’s the thing: It’s fashion — meant to titillate, provoke, and eroticize — not to be taken seriously. It’s almost creepy of others to point out the ick factor, right? Yet, given that most people would probably not want to see their own mom in her underwear, the in-your-face, S&M-tinged photos feel ... off.
And the response on Twitter has been a collective cringe.
To be fair, the Brant boys haven’t exactly grown up in a conventional household, with a world-famous supermodel mom (who was once engaged to rocker Axl Rose) and a billionaire art collector dad, Peter Brant, all living on a 300-acre Connecticut estate complete with 50 ponies and a polo field. The family’s attitude toward sexuality is clearly fluid — a life-size nude bust of Seymour hangs prominently in the Brant family home. And they’re clearly an affectionate bunch: Three years ago, photos surfaced of Peter Jr. and his bikini-clad mother hugging and kissing on the beach. The images sparked outrage, with people calling their relationship “weird," prompting Peter to defend their bond on his Facebook page. He wrote, “My mother and I are very close as she is with all her children ... We have nothing to hide and with that in mind I would like to say that I am openly gay ... and yes, our relationship may be different because of my sexuality.”
But glamour shots are nothing special for the Seymour-Brant family. In the exclusive Harper's Bazaar interview, Seymour says her sons used to dress her in couture for parent-teacher conferences and she would pick them up from school after photo shoots — still in full hair and makeup, snatch.
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Sunday, February 9, 2014
Thursday, February 6, 2014
Wednesday, February 5, 2014
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Monday, February 3, 2014
Many "Friends" of Clintons...
Lest we forget the Clinton's past. Suggested reading, "Compromise" by Terry Reed and John
Cummings. Sheds light on Mena Arkansas happenings. Does anyone remember when Bill was
Arkansas Governor?......
Food for Thought
Just a quick refresher course lest we forget what has happened to many " friends " of the Clinton's.
1 - James McDougal - Clinton's convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr's investigation.
2 - Mary Mahoney - A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in
Georgetown . The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the
White House.
3 - Vince Foster - Former White House counselor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock's Rose Law
firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.
4 - Ron Brown - Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a
plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown's skull
resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his
willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died. A few days later the
air traffic controller committed suicide.
5 - C. Victor Raiser, II - Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane
crash in July 1992.
6 - Paul Tulley - Democratic National Committee Political Director
found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock,
September 1992. Described by Clinton as a "dear friend and trusted adviser".
7 - Ed Willey - Clinton fundraiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound
to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton
groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.
8 - Jerry Parks - Head of Clinton's gubernatorial security team in Little Rock. Gunned down in his car at a
deserted intersection outside Little Rock. Parks son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.
9 - James Bunch - Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a "Black Book" of people
which
contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas
10 - James Wilson - Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater..
Sunday, February 2, 2014
Here Is How They Treat Our Country...
And we'll give them food, shelter, work and medicine... I guess Libtards don't see the Barbarians at the gate..
Saturday, February 1, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)